First to the topic relevance. How did it become part of this thread? Isn't it obvious? If I step back and look at it without prejudice -ENGINE Guy appears to be sharing a related notion that even though heads look innocuous, it was possible that something else is going on. Hence the point of raising the existence of 'UNDER COVER PORTED' into the discussion. He was citing a fact that MBE did the heads after Kevin had provided that 'Mikes' did Billy's heads. I am inferring that by the order of the posts when I came in and read the thread. At the outset, I read this Under Cover Ported (UCP) thing and didn't understand it. Why would I, I am not an engine guy. One could speculate his last sentence inferred something but I was more interested in learning what the context of UCP was and moved past that.
So I searched for it and found the reason that it might be relevant and thought the forum might be interested to know more so I posted a follow-on for others - you know desire to be helpful and no subterfuge in play. At the core, is that not the charter of a discussion forum? To discuss the merit of a topic? For me personally, I had no intent to dissuade anyone or shape opinion and if I thought what I found wasn't relevant I would not have 'jacked the thread'. Call me done. This is the second time you have called out something like this where I thought I was contributing and apparently I am not savvy enough to know what is and isn't in bounds. By the way, ENGINE Guy wrote it, and I guess I am guilty by association. To make it known. I have huge respect and appreciation for the Pauch Family and think the whole thing was a dick move by the track. I won't wait for three strikes and you are out. I'll sign off and become read-only from here on out. Not going away mad, just going away.
|
