The info provided was very informative, but when it is presented in the middle of a thread that is about a very specific occurence, it is more than possible that some would think that the reason for the information being presented in this thread was to open that up as a possibility that it had something to do with the specific case. One of the posts above stated, "Not sure if applies to this situation." That statement implies that you are raising it as a possibility, and with all the rumor/speculation that already has been offered, I made the decision, and stand by the decision to respond by saying that it does not belong in a thread where we are trying to avoid rumor/speculation. The thread was my attempt at presenting what was provided publicly by the parties involved, and then providing the specific responses by the engine performance folks I referred to in the top thread. I made that decision after getting a few calls that were essentially, "Why are those guys bringing that up in the middle of all this?" Just trying to keep to what has been presented (by NES Mgt, Pauch Facebook) about this specific situation regarding the decision made on the heads pulled from competition on 9/4, and not looking to further confuse folks with unrelated "not sure if it applies" type of information.
|
