| Msg ID: 2834933 |
Wall Wednesdays +0/-0
|
| Author:kjeyres
11/20/2024 8:31:59 AM |
|
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2834947 |
Wall Wednesdays +0/-0
|
| Author:Pee Wee Fan
11/20/2024 11:07:52 AM Reply to: 2834933 |
Great photos Kevin. Thank you for posting. That hood scoop on the #6 car in the 2nd photo looks to be higher than the roof! Up periscope! Scott Ely |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2834957 |
Wall Wednesdays +0/-0
|
| Author:Steve Cameron
11/20/2024 2:20:03 PM Reply to: 2834933 |
Is the #36 coupe in the 5th photo the ex-Jarzombek/Cranmer #1? |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2834960 |
Wall Wednesdays +0/-0
|
| Author:John Springsteel
11/20/2024 3:57:31 PM Reply to: 2834957 |
94 modern Jeff Loesch? My memory stinks. |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2834961 |
Wall Wednesdays +0/-0
|
| Author:kjeyres
11/20/2024 3:57:36 PM Reply to: 2834957 |
George Schaefer in the 36 Coupe. It could be. Jerry was on to a Vega by then. I know Joe Hurley had that car later. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2835003 |
Steve +0/-0
|
| Author:kjeyres
11/21/2024 7:51:20 AM Reply to: 2834957 |
I found out it was the Jarzombek/Cranmer coupe. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2835025 |
Thanks Kevin... +0/-0
|
| Author:Steve Cameron
11/21/2024 9:27:30 AM Reply to: 2835003 |
The comment posted on this picture pretty much confirmed what I was thinking. |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2834970 |
Wall Wednesdays +0/-0
|
| Author:Caddy Daddy
11/20/2024 6:11:00 PM Reply to: 2834933 |
Gotta love that tunnel ram scoop on the X-6!! I can’t recall anyone else trying that. File it under “I’ll try anything to squeeze the last bit of horsepower out of this thing”. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2834972 |
Wall Wednesdays +0/-0
|
| Author:John Springsteel
11/20/2024 6:43:48 PM Reply to: 2834970 |
I remember Eddie Moench saying that the viability was better with that scoop. Speaking of scoops, Eddie always had the latest scoop on everything. RIP |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2835002 |
Wall Wednesdays +0/-0
|
| Author:kjeyres
11/21/2024 7:50:01 AM Reply to: 2834972 |
They got rid of it because it forced too much air into the carburetor, washing the fuel through the cylinders. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
